Governance and Oversight
So after slogging thru this I see the following:
*A dedicated three-member DAO subcommittee will oversee:
Project eligibility and inclusion
Tier and allocation models for each project
Complex evaluations, such as illiquid or unique NFT assets
The fund is not limited to Ember Sword and is scalable across multiple defunct GameFi projects, pending evaluation and approval by DAO governance.
Final funding decisions for each project will require full DAO approval through a governance vote, ensuring transparency and decentralized accountability.
So in short its to investigate and recommend which will lead to a vote.
I'm fine with this.
I noted the terms specifying three members and five recommended in the proposal. This is probably better, but not consistent.
Noted, I felt 5 was better as I view myself as more of a support member to the group. Just having 2 didn't make since and having 3 + me meant we could end up in a situation where 2 would just override 1 in every situation. Basically I plan to encourage them to find agreement in the group and if we reach an impasse where they're split 2/2 I'll break the tie.
Governance and Oversight
So after slogging thru this I see the following:
*A dedicated three-member DAO subcommittee will oversee:
Project eligibility and inclusion
Tier and allocation models for each project
Complex evaluations, such as illiquid or unique NFT assets
The fund is not limited to Ember Sword and is scalable across multiple defunct GameFi projects, pending evaluation and approval by DAO governance.
Final funding decisions for each project will require full DAO approval through a governance vote, ensuring transparency and decentralized accountability.
So in short its to investigate and recommend which will lead to a vote.
I'm fine with this.
I noted the terms specifying three members and five recommended in the proposal. This is probably better, but not consistent.
Noted, I felt 5 was better as I view myself as more of a support member to the group. Just having 2 didn't make since and having 3 + me meant we could end up in a situation where 2 would just override 1 in every situation. Basically I plan to encourage them to find agreement in the group and if we reach an impasse where they're split 2/2 I'll break the tie.