You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Expand SPS DAO Treasurer Positions

in #spsproposal4 months ago (edited)

Ya'll are getting away from the point by getting distracted by focusing on that comment as that convo was going off topic to begin with. I'm here talking to Everyone , regardless of stake - About the fundamentals of keeping Company/Team & DAO Separate as Matt always talks about. THAT IS ALL. All I see is avoidance of the topic at hand.

Sort:  

I understand and obviously I think your concerns have merit or I wouldn't have resigned. Whether other people have a conflict is a different issue though.

Very true, all I can do is voice my concerns, maybe be a little passionately annoying about it, & when I have the funds to do so (in-between jobs), maybe find a way to start communicating in proposal chat about creating a Proposal to help better define boundaries Between DAO positions and Company. Even if not completely separate maybe the greater community could agree to limiting the number of Company/Team members allowed to take DAO Roles - especially with Treasury Keys (so it can't theoretically become owned by the Company again). I appreciate all you do for the Community even if I get loud on rare occasions (SilentRIOT definitely fits my Introverted/Extrovert vibes haha) ^.^ Hope you have a great day Bro. Namaste 💜