I don't think we're on the same page here. All I'm saying is we as a community should choose to maintain healthy boundaries for our Ethos. If it passes then yeah, there's nothing to change at that point, but until then this is still just a pre-proposal and we all can vote to edit the 3rd Elect for this position - A community member that's not part of the Company/Team.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes. This is what staked SPS voting is for. That is how the community choose. Whether we ban company members from being a part of DAO itself is a DAO Proposal. You are welcome to make it yourself and we can have a vote from the stakeholders.
I agree completely with this. I do think this is a DAO decision as for the rules, and an individual decision for anyone that wants to be a treasurer/board member/etc.
True, I can very much agree to this! Once I'm in a better financial situation I'll make a DAO proposal for healthy boundaries. But also, its not like we really got a choice on the first 3 elects in the first place which is kinda mehh. A poll woulda been cool.