between the two proposals, it removes the need for proposals and makes the process easier for approvals. If I knew the other was going to fail, this would be an easy yes.
why have SPS...
dont like this direction
between the two proposals, it removes the need for proposals and makes the process easier for approvals. If I knew the other was going to fail, this would be an easy yes.
why have SPS...
dont like this direction
For what it's worth, I think we either need more treasurers or we'd have to look at centralizing their time zones better, which has its own risks. Not being able to get 6 treasurers together in a 1 hour period has been an ongoing problem nearly since the start. With HIVE having a 1 hour max window on multisig it's very problematic.
As far as the other proposal, I was asked to run it because quite a few top holders think it's a waste of time to run proposals for small expenses (like having the DAO buy pickle promo cards). I'm generally neutral on that one and even if it does pass, I would hope the caliber of treasurers we have would stop it being from being used frivolously in the first place, because I certainly wouldn't. That said it's crypto, so your position and concern are understandable and I won't argue with you about it.
Slightly off topic but I am unclear as to why there is an assumption that the DAO is going to buy pickle cards. I am not saying we shouldn't, but when and how did that get decided?
Maybe ask Hive to change it to a 3 hour window?
So here's the thing, I actually did. A year ago. It's even coded into the next hardfork that we'll have 24 hour windows on multisig. Here we are a year later still trying to suffer through it and make it work, still with no timeline for the next hardfork.
https://gitlab.syncad.com/hive/hive/-/merge_requests/1383