Are you sure about that? Look at the first tournament on your appendix. Scarred Hand is a CA only tournament. There were 38 participants and you want to cancel GFs with less than 48. If you look at the GF tournament schedule and go back a month, you'll find that about half of them would be canceled under these rules
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I said most CA. The ones cancelled are typically tournaments with heavy card restrictions or Expert level tournaments with very high CP requirements. Simply tournaments for which a small amount of players even qualify. There are exceptions and fluctuations though.
I'm not saying it is a perfect change, but in the end it is something I wanted to suggest to the DAO, because I think it is better than what we have now. That's what the whole proposal thing is about after all, present the DAO with a choice and then let the stake decide.
I agree with the idea of reducing sps inflation, but this solution is too extreme. I used to be one of those people who played GF tournaments but had to stop when they got rid of daily rentals and it became too expensive. I tried to argue back then to let us keep daily rentals because our low tournament participation today is directly related to that decision. It's not just GF tournaments that will be affected. Some of the most fun tournaments in the game are the ones that mix sets like Untamed with Rebellion. You have to think a little and not play the same teams you normally do. Most, if not all of those tournaments will be cancelled too. I think we are on the verge of making another bad decision like ending leagues.