Introduction
General Asad    Durrani and I   have    gelled  ever    since   we  met at  a   Track-II    dialogue named  after   Thailand’s  Chao    Phraya  River.  It  was held    in  the aftermath   of  26/11, in   the wake    of  Western apprehension    of  what    may come    to  pass.   Who knows,  if  a madman    was in  control we  could   all still   be  blown   to  kingdom come,   in  revenge for 1971    or  even    1947. General   Saheb   has been    a   friend. His straightforwardness is  striking.   There   is  no bullshit;    for him a   spade   is  always  a   spade,  which   is  at  times   disappointing   for me. He  has never   hesitated   to  speak   up  or  render  help. When  Prime   Minister    Narendra    Modi    was preparing   to  take    the oath    of  office  in 2014,    two notables    from    Srinagar    called  and suggested   that    Pakistan’s  prime minister, Mian    Nawaz   Sharif, be  invited.    They    said    he  was keen    to  come.   Since   it was  early   days,   people  in  high    places  were    prepared    to  listen, so  I   passed  the message along.  There   was excitement  in  government, but the bigwigs wanted  an assurance    that    Mian    Saheb   would   come    if  invited. To confirm,    I   first   called  a   senior  diplomat    in  Pakistan.   His advice  was to  not risk it,    because Nawaz   Sharif  might   not be  allowed to  come    to  India.  Somewhat disappointed   I   called  the General.    His response    was unequivocal;    there   was no reason   for Nawaz   Sharif  not to  come.   Generals    in  Pakistan    are generally   right,  and more    so  Asad    Durrani. Our    wives   met at  one of  the Track-II    meetings    on  Kashmir,    held    in  December 2015   at  a   Dead    Sea resort  in  Jordan. My  wife    Paran   and the Begum   are poles   apart. Paran    enjoys  an  occasional  smoke   with    the General whereas the Begum   approves    of neither  smoking nor drinking.   Yet they    got along   like    a   house   on  fire.   Incidentally, at    the same    meeting,    the Pakistanis  enquired    whether there   was any hope    of forward  movement    between India   and Pakistan.   I   stuck   my  neck    out and said something  should  happen  soon.   Lo  and behold, we  were    in  Abu Dhabi   on Christmas    Day on  our way home    when    we  learnt  that    Modiji  had dropped in  at Lahore.  Since   then,   however,    the process has gone    nowhere. If it’s    any consolation,    Pakistan    is  in  a   bigger  mess    than    we  are.    The man India put   its faith   in, Nawaz   Sharif, is  likely  to  be  kept    out of  power   (along  with    his family) by  the military    when    the next    elections   are held,   likely  in  August  2018;   the
military’s  preferred   choice  is  the current PM, Shahid  Khaqan  Abbasi, whom    Mian Saheb  had handpicked  to  replace him. In any India-Pakistan  conversation,   Kashmir will    inevitably  come    up. In  January 2018,   during  my  annual  pilgrimage  to  Goa,    I   met a   Kashmiri    in  a   tailoring   shop.   He told me  that    Kashmir wanted  independence. ‘Whatever for?’   I   enquired. ‘How  would   you expect  me  to  react   if  you walked  into    my  shop    and slapped me?’    he  said. That’s    what    the security    forces  do  in  Kashmir.    Anyone  can be  stopped and beaten, he  claimed.    The slightest   protest or  stone-pelting   leads   to  tear    gas and pellet guns.    Kashmir remains on  the boil:   the Line    of  Control (LoC)   and border  are more volatile   than    usual   and questions   are being   raised  about   the government’s    muscular policy. A  reformed    militant    who had flirted with    the Lashkar-e-Toiba visited me  more recently   and spoke   of  the threat  of  increasing  radicalism  in  the Valley. He  said    the youth   in  South   Kashmir prepared    for martyrdom   and had no  concern for Pakistan as they    believed    they    were    fighting    for Allah.  As  former  Pakistan    Foreign Secretary Riaz  Mohammad    Khan    acknowledged,   the 2008    Mumbai  terrorist   attack  did irreparable damage  to  the Kashmiri    cause   and tarnished   Islamabad’s image   as  well. Pakistan  had been    out of  it  since   then,   until   we  brought them    back    into    the picture in  2016. The   militant,   who now resembles   a   professor   more    than    a   terrorist,  warned  that the    Jamaat-e-Islami,    once    with    pockets only    in  Sopore, Shopian,    Kulgam  and Pulwama,    was now omnipresent in  radicalising    the youth.  It  had made    inroads in the  state   government  and infiltrated the J&K Police  as  well.   The central jail    in Srinagar was the hub of  radical indoctrination, he  said    from    personal    experience. Militancy   was a   thriving    industry,   where   everyone    was someone with    a   vested interest in  the status  quo—except  that    the status  quo is  never   static. The Kashmiris who   crave   peace   live    in  fear    of  the next    explosion,  not knowing where   or  when    it will happen. What    a   change  this    is  from    the time    when    Srinagar    was a   city    of  great style,    from    the 1960s   to  the early   ’80s. The   situation   in  Kashmir,    like    our relationship    with    Pakistan,   is  going   nowhere. It waits   for another Vajpayee.   Could   General Pervez  Musharraf   and Dr  Farooq Abdullah,    sharing many    similarities,   given   an  opportunity,    have    found   a   solution    on the  LoC?    Kashmiris   crave   peace   but there   can be  no  peace   or  forward movement    in Kashmir  so  long    as  we  keep    relating    it  to  elections   elsewhere   in  the country,    just    as we   do  in  our relationship    with    Pakistan.   We  need    to  talk    to  Pakistan    as  much    as  we need to  engage  with    Kashmir.    As  Chief   Minister    Mehbooba    Mufti   said    in  the state
assembly    in  February    2018,   with    the risk    of  being   called  anti-national,  there   is  no alternative  to  engagement  with    Pakistan.   Or, as  the old Kashmiri    communist Mohammed  Yousuf  Tarigami    said,   seeking a   ‘security   solution’   to  a   fundamentally political problem will    not succeed. Finding    a   way out of  any mess    requires    a   willingness to  listen. It  connects    us  to Kashmir  and to  ourselves   as  well.   But we  are so  caught  up  in  the noise   around  us that very    few have    the time    to  listen. Sentiments  at  times   are more    illuminating than   facts.  Empathy is  the key to  understanding   Kashmir. I  have    learnt  much    from    Track-II,   including   the similarities    between Kashmir, Afghanistan    and Balochistan.    Noted   Pakistani   author  Ahmed   Rashid  once    said    that if Kashmir were    resolved,   Afghanistan would   be  a   cakewalk.   At  one of  our meetings,   Rustom  Shah    Mohmand,    a   Pakistani   bureaucrat, diplomat,   and a   gem of a    human   being,  remarked    that    Pakistan    needed  to  put its own house   in  order   in Balochistan  before  finding fault   with    India   in  Kashmir. Surprising as  it  may sound,  I   was as  happy   leaving the Prime   Minister’s  Office  in 2004 as  I   was joining it  in  2001,   even    though  these   were    by  far my  best    years   in government.  Yes,    there   was a   tinge   of  sadness at  leaving the RAW just    when    I   was beginning   to  enjoy   it; 17  months  is  not enough  for a   chief.  But there   are so  many worlds,    so  much    to  do. Retirement  is  the beginning   not the end of  life.   Who could have  imagined    I   could   even    become  an  author  in  the bargain?    As  someone said, there is  no  pleasure    in  having  nothing to  do; the fun is  in  having  lots    to  do  and doing   nothing. Having lived   more    than    my  life    of  secrecy,    spookiness  still   clings  to  me. A Kashmiri  friend, not knowing we  had shifted residence   to  Defence Colony  in  Delhi, dropped  in  and enquired    if  this    was my  ‘new    safe    house’. Pakistani   friends still don’t believe that    my  only    e-mail  ID  is  my  wife’s. And my  wife    tells   all her friends that    you can never   get the whole   truth   out of  this    spook.  A   ‘cover  story’  is  still useful    at  times. When the idea    of  a   joint   project was first   mooted  by  Peter   Jones   at  one of  our Track-II    meetings    in  Istanbul,   the General laughed and said    nobody  would   believe us  even    if  we  wrote   fiction.    We  have    tried   to  stay    as  close   to  the truth   as  we  believe it  to  be  even    if  some    of  it  is  regarded    as  fiction.    The reality is  that    there   are normally    more    than    two sides   to  most    stories.    Truth   is  a   kaleidoscope. I know    there   will    be  people  in  the fraternity  who will    say how did these   swines get  so  chummy: who was working for whom?   After   all we  have    each    been    a   part    of licensed skulduggery on  either  side. Not   everyone    will    agree   with    what    we  have    said,   possibly    nobody. But the effort here has been    to  make    some    sense   of  the India-Pakistan  conundrum   in  the hope
that    sanity  will    someday prevail. I  have    often   been    labelled    an  optimist.   If  so, it’s    only    a   way of  life    and I   have    no regrets, or  as  General Saheb   says,   he  doesn’t give    a   damn.   All I   can say it’s    been    a great life.   As  Mark    Twain   puts    it, good    friends,    good    books   and a   sleepy  conscience: this    is  the ideal   life.   And this,   I   believe,    is  how the General and I   have    gone    about it,   even    though  he  is  much    more    of  a   realist. Finally,   this    project could   never   have    taken   off without our friend, philosopher and guide,  Aditya  Sinha. A.S. Dulat .
Sort:  Trending