Have you heard the concept of "Burden of truth".It states that if you think God is real,you have to proof he is,not the people that claim him not to be.
Everyone can say that something which seemingly doesn't exist is real.If we had to prove everyone wrong about such claims all the time,we would not have time to debate actual logical ideas
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't have to prove anything but in saying that I have more than enough proof to satisfy myself.
It would be great if neo-darwinists practised what they preached but unfortunately double-standards apply.
If we are to be consistent the 'burden of proof' standard should apply to the theory of neo-darwinism (natural selection acting on random mutations).
Neo-darwinists should stop lying by stating that their theories are facts. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are very few scientists today that are defending the theory, it is as good as dead - but the theory is still found in text books and taught in classrooms all over the world. Children and students are being lied to but that seems to be ok with most atheists!
This is just one of many blatant examples of the hypocrisy that is so prevalent in the scientific community.