Daily Flag Report (2018-04-10)

abusereports (72)in #steem • 3 years ago (edited)

The accounts below have been flagged for spamming, scamming, or other shameful behavior.

Total amount of rewards returned to the reward pool in the past 24 hours by @abusereports:

$68.65

Incidents

Author	Posts	Comments	Total Removed
@gaman	0	46	$6.17
@faerees	1	0	$0.15
@carlsmith	1	0	$0.15
@newsteemians	0	47	$17.28
@danpilkington	1	0	$0.15
@kiranmaidurga	3	59	$13.96
@antoniahenry	1	0	$0.15
@socorro	1	0	$0.15
@samshepherd	1	0	$0.15
@jodystewart	1	0	$0.15
@cuddlekitten	2	85	$7.4
@mobarak	0	1	$0.08
@mycat	9	1	$13.81
@halfpast10	0	5	$8.87

Note: The kitten commenters have been removed from the flag bot.

Current Account Flag List:

@carlsmith #photo spammer
@faerees #photo spammer
@antoniahenry #photo spammer
@jodystewart #photo spammer
@socorro #photo spammer
@samshepherd #photo spammer
@danpilkington #photo spammer
@phenombot #comment spammer
@kiranmaidurga #comment spammer
@foodandtravell #comment spammer
@gaman #comment spammer
@newsteemians #comment spammer
@neilpatel #photo spammer
@morganbarnett #photo spammer
@arthurbruce #photo spammer
@ciarahamilton #photo spammer
@luciusshah #photo spammer

#steemit #abuse #photo #comment

3 years ago in #steem by abusereports (72)

$54.09

Sort:

Trending

[-]

fraenk (63) 3 years ago

Thanks for removing the kitten from the flag-list!

Retracting the flags would be awesome, but if it's a manual process that hinders progress on the front of fighting actual abusers, that's a sacrifice I'll happily make!

$0.07

2 votes

[-]

fraenk (63) 3 years ago (edited)

Upon closer inspection:

Total amount of rewards [potentially] returned to the reward pool in the past 24 hours:
$68.65[?]

This calculation seems based on all the down-votes "potential" negative rewards impact. In the case of @cuddlekitten far less than $7.4 have actually been removed. As a matter of fact, less than $1 has been returned from the kitten's rewards.

85 comments have received 42 upvotes from various users in the community - that said, it also shows the kitten isn't received as spam by too many!

the average upvote size was 4,745,035,349 RShares (~$0.014)
total open rewards were ~$0.572

which has been downvoted like so:

each comment was flagged with ~25,000,000,000 negative Rshares (~$0.075)
total potential impact -$6.459

This analysis is only based on the stats of @cuddlekitten. In the case of other accounts being flagged like the @newsteemians example where each individual flagged comment had a $0.70 pseudo-self-vote by @gaman the numbers in the OP are quite accurate!

Kudos on that one!!

$0.04

2 votes

[-]

omitaylor (57) 3 years ago

A helpful bot that brings smiles to the userbase (especially with a living breathing human interactive admin) is not a burden but a contribution in itself (spiritually and technologically) worth payout. I don't understand the logic behind some of the crusades. It's like, attack first, apologize later? I appreciate the idea of reducing phishing links but if an automated message contains no link or the word dot, it should not be a priority in the first place imo. Why is the number of comments more important that the quality of comments? It took an hour and a half for a phishing link to get downvoted on my page but we're downvoting kittens and foreign speakers who write short sentences. Smh lol omg

$0.13

2 votes

[-]

fraenk (63) 3 years ago

I guess our overlords would call it "collateral damage" ;)

While I also do appreciate the initiatives around "cleaning" steemit from abuse like reward-farming, scams and phishing... the self-proclaimed warriors-for-good around here are too often found on the bordlerlines of becoming abusive themselves...

ah well... we're all just people with egos and a limited attention span after all ;)

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

trumpman (75) 3 years ago

So you are the genious behind cuddlekitten ? 😺😺😺😸😸😸😸😸😸😼😼😼😽😽😽😽

$0.04

1 vote

[-]

fraenk (63) 3 years ago

heh... lol... yeah... I'm the "evil mastermind" that tries to put cuddles and cuteness into cans...

$0.04

1 vote

[-]

linnyplant (60) 3 years ago

I’ll also add my appreciation of @cuddlekitten ‘s removal. Yes, I can see why there might be a concern. But in the end, that kitten brings smiles with the cute arty appearances and upvotes. I’ll gratefully take that over no love at all. :)

$0.06

1 vote

[-]

catlady.natascha (54) 2 years ago

I totally agree! I also appreciate @cuddlekitten and the sweet kitten art <3 Brings smiles and positivity and support with upvotes, resteems and comments ^•.•^

Posted using Partiko iOS

$0.00

[-]

warpedweaver (50) 3 years ago

I had to come look at this page because someone that just commented on my recent post was flagged. @gaman is the name. I am now following your page and thank you for keeping an eye open for folks that may try to take advantage of me.

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

nigelpredmore (28) 3 years ago

i didnt do anything wrong and this guy flagged me , guess hes jealous of my race car i hand built and posted , i havent posted content in a month

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

ecid (32) 3 years ago (edited)

I don't think the flag was for you, but rather the commentee. I just got the same response, or my "commentee" did. I do suggest this user/bot open his/her/it's reply to the individual he/she/it is targeting.

Confused me.

$0.00

[-]