Yeah, that’s correct. I edited it.
And it should also be noted that they claimed to have HF20 almost ready to go when HF19 was implemented in early June last year. Ten months later...
For reference:
https://steemit.com/steemit/@steemitblog/proposing-hardfork-0-20-0-velocity
nah, first will be 19.4 ...appbase?
Or will they do both, HF20+appbase?
Because, well, why not introduce 2 error factors
Only two would be an improvement. We’re used to a minimum of five at once around here.
Maybe it needs to be an even number? :)
I thought STINC was using a Fibonacci sequence.