There are no such things as Licenses as Compromises.
You mean the creator? Yeah, it would be unlawful and utterly absurd for anyone other than the creator to claim exclusive ownership and right to copy a piece of content.
Actually, I was talking about the concept of OWNING ideas as being repugnant to REASON (ideas cannot be stolen or possessed exclusively without being secrets) and Reason is what Lawful Means, as nothing unreasonable can be made positive by Law.
They are private laws if you understand what the word PRIVATE means then it's clear what I say. If you want to learn more research Sovereign VS Citizen. I don't need luck. Law can only happen with consent, if I am dragged into court I will claim the Writ of Habeas Corpus and order the judge to dismiss the allegations for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and to finned the prosecuting attorney should it be found out that no performance bid bond was set, and if it was I will claim it and order the judge to mail me the check with it. If you want to DRAG me into court, it better be a Court of Record and it better be at the beckoning of a Grand Jury, all else doesn't concern me. Do you think I care what the LITERALLY over 50 million statues say?