One change at a time is the wise solution, a "situation" that is as common sense as it gets.
I am not saying that sometimes two different things could get bunched together, but I am saying change one thing about one function and not two.
We have a chance to understand how these changes affect the platform, and we shouldn't squander them, how many times do we need to go through voting curves and vote depletion, wouldn't it make more sense to take every opportunity you have to measure these major functions early on?
I think the sentiment of wait and see is there because people are finally getting a flat reward curve, and they are grateful for that or at least sympathetic, but I don't think that they will hold the same sentiment for HF20.