I totally agree with the aiming for peace, harmony and the associated loving enlightenment. In common law such is expressed as aiming for comity, peace, and security. Hence the constitution and the governance by consent. Contract law also embodies this in its attempt to provide conflict resolution.
A valid contract requires.
1)Full disclosure
2)Consent
Adherence to the none aggression principal. As in all parties must be willing participants.
Any application of force is evidence of no contract. A contract exist when it is paid.
One can see that really the none aggression principal runs all through society and it is the bases for comity, peach and security. In reality both parities have to willing produce their responsibilities per contract and the only thing that is at stake for each party is reputation. Which is funny because no one has control over what others think about them, but what you do and how you for fill your end of the contract is everything.
P.S @drakos I am unable to vote for because witness voting page in Steemit.com is not registering.
Ultimately, a high level of understanding (aka enlightenment) can lead beyond even contract rules to a state where we all know that life conditions are constantly changing and so we know that there is no real benefit in 'punishing' anyone for breach of a contract - we simply seek to understand the details of why the event occurred and thus we know more about the beings involved and whether or not to continue interacting with them. :)