I just voted your post up and I doubt it's going to offer much in terms of curation. People tend to vote for what is valuable but I think one problem with voting is it's STRICTLY UP AND DOWN. If it were more detailed so you could communicate more like insightful, interesting, sad, funny, then maybe people would be able to vote up and curate in more creative and diversified ways. This way people would vote more and you'd have more granular curation.
Up or down doesn't communicate much. It doesn't tell the world why a particular post is valuable. This means people trying to figure out what to curate cannot for example decide to vote up the most funny posts on Steemit with their bot because they will have no way to determine what is or isn't funny according to quantified means. Only a human can detect funny but a bot could then vote up everything initial human curators voted as funny.
Yes, I like where you are going with this..... we could have more than one way to vote and reward voters who voted as most people did, for example if your bot voted "funny" but most people voted "angry" then your bots gets nothing and its fair since you didn´t actually read the post.
Maybe this something where the use of Emoji's can be used to vote on content. You have a range of emojis, most likely 5 at most that people can choose from. This help give a more granular response and eliminate the binary option that computers are good at.
I like that. It adds colour and fun and familiarity for "average" social media users.