RE: Why I won't support Jerry Banfield anymore - JerryCoin

[dynamicsteemians]

No, thanks for letting me know of the misspelling. I'm sorry, my comment aroused such suspicions, paranoia and what can only be construed as anger. I actually just recast my vote for @Jerrybanfield and I would love to see his response for exhibiting behaviors that represent about everything thats wrong with American Society. Its hard to blame him for acting in this way, as its what is taught in America to win, if your paying attention, but its hard to vote for him knowing his moves. So before I uncast my witness vote for him I would love to see his response. Sorry for the misspelling. I just saw your

Humorless...

Description that was cool!

Comments

[charitybot]

I was just fucking around with you rofl, and yeah hard work is taught to be a sucker's game in the states so you're right about that. That's what happens when you stomp out a collectivist mentality over the generations and teach everyone to fight over some scraps.

[mlgcrypto]

i dont know what you're talking about dude. theyve been pushing the collectivism pretty hard over here. Just not as hard as in Europe LOL

[charitybot]

Who is they.

In 2016, there were 14.6 million members in the U.S., down from 17.7 million in 1983. The percentage of workers belonging to a union in the United States (or total labor union "density") was 10.7%, compared to 20.1% in 1983.[1][2] Union membership in the private sector has fallen under 7%[3] — levels not seen since 1932. From a global perspective, the density in 2013 was 7.7% in France, 18.1% in Germany, 27.1% in Canada, and 88.9% in Iceland, which is currently highest in the world.

I should have not used the word collectivism, yes there have been race-based things to distract from the class-based notions.

[mlgcrypto]

i interpreted collectivism as socialist agenda. The Democrats have been pushing for quite a bit more they just haven't been able to do it yet. If it werent for the fact that Europe's collectivism is facing visible problems then i believe they would have been more successful

[charitybot]

Democrats are corporatist. Targeted attempts to spur collectivism among individual subgroups is just an attempt to break up the power of the united lower classes and increase infighting.

[mlgcrypto]

100% agreed, but they're corporatists who also want more control over the corporations themselves, which inturn makes them socialists/communist/marxist/what ever you want to call themists as long as you accept that they have become extreme left wing

it doesnt matter what you call your rulers, whether it be Government, Royalty, Masters, God, or Corporations. What matter is the degree of control they seek/posses over the life of their subjects