After some run-ins with @steemcleaners, @dlike is willing to explore decline payout options for people that just want to share interesting things without any commentary.
There are just too many people willing to abuse curation trails or bid bots on a shared link. I would be okay if the link was the work of the person who shared it, but more often than not, that's not the case. They can't even bother with an up-to 500 character note like Pinterest when they toss a random link to be voted on.
But like you said, there are positives and people can choose to flag them into oblivion if they are bad enough.
Hope you are doing well too. Thanks for commenting!
At one time they had a max payout limit of 30sbd (i pissed myself laughing when mehta blew a wad upvoting a share there and lost a fortune!) but now I see its been raised to 600. Surely if they can have payout limits applied, and applied at a more reasonable level like the 30 or even 20, then this fixes everything?
And how is this different to steemhunt for instance? Thats just specialist sharing of stuff to buy?
Posted using Partiko Android
That guy does some funny stuff if you've ever followed him around bid bot Discords.
600 STU seems ridiculous. I do feel the 20-30 STU range seems more reasonable.
I still stay clear of discord, it confuses the life out of me!
sorry, its 300max but it definitely used to be 30.
I suppose that's done for the possibility of a trending discussion.
Some promotional services choose to not vote on content from @dmania, etc., but I don't think a significant number will opt for that approach.