All I see from here is that it's slightly less desirable to delegate to a bot (although they be able to recover from passing it in the form of offering less ROI to buyers, or probably an equilibrium in-between).
That's quite good in my opinion, when it comes to the bid bot ecosystem. However, lazy is lazy and it may not actually change any behaviors.
We should see if this affects the lease market and the self-voting situation (self farmers that try to hide everything). I do recall that in the same vein it will cut into self-farmers a little as well. But it's hard to tell by how much.
I like that the general principle is easy to remember-- whatever the 'leakage' to others is, it doubles in 50/50. But there's no getting around the fact that authors are going to get less. Authors are already not getting much though, would it lead to less published blogs? My head hurts.
Yes, so then, how many buy and with effectively cheaper flags (as it takes less to give them a loss) how many take the risk?
For those coming in fresh to the system, do you think they will have as much issue with it?
Perhaps. dunno. might be a good thing :D I do think that once curators got a little bit more, more would power up and in time, they will increase the values they add to posts, making the value higher. From what I have seen, the people from @abh12345's engagement and curation leagues are among the most active and fastest growing.
I'm here to say that I've read the post and much of the commentary, and now my head hurts!
To bring new money to SP, I think a switch to reward the investors with more would be a good incentive. Authors who are just authors, have no risk and would need to produce 'quality' to receive support.
I do see less posts, but that's good for those who continue to do so isn't it? :)
Yep.
I think it would
... Having trouble with comments through steemit.