@blocktrades, @minority-report and @alpha are owned by same person. All the transfers from bots (@postpromoter, @buildawhale) are payments for delegation, payment from @steemit is for proposal system development.
Even if @darthknight is @blocktrades, who cares? Anyone can have more accounts.
As a general idea, he should have asked Steem's witnesses for help. He never tried to contact STEEM witnesses. His first posting on the community was that he was preparing through the law.
Witnesses stole money from him, he have right to sue them.
They just want a justification to steal people's funds.
Grasping at straws.
Yes, I'm still trying to figure out why an individual account owner is excluded from a principle that Tron/JS claimed as being basic. All I see is a bunch of whataboutisms.
Having multiple accounts is definitely not an issue by itself. But Blocktrades created sock puppet accounts in order to take control of the Steem blockchain in a more malicious way than Justin Sun. He introduced Darthknight as a new account and fooled all of us.
How is that more malicious than getting the exchanges involved to install 20 sock puppet witnesses? Please explain me.
crickets
Alright, since you have no answer to my previous question, let's try another one and hope it's easier for you. Know I did my best to make it as simple as possible a question for you.
How is a lie in an account intro oost more malicious than a commitment to not freeze accounts or stake, to then do exactly that as the top20 witnesses on Steem have almost all done?