You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is The Voting System For Steem Witnesses Unbalanced & Unfairly Skewed/Biased? Simple Improvements Might Make a Big Difference Here.

in #steem6 years ago

Upvoted for visibility, but disagree on "all registered witnesses". What do you mean - technically - by that? Everyone who has their signing key set to not-null?
Yes, I'm all for more informative page, maybe even increasing limit to 100 or 200, but no, not "all".

By the way, interesting thing to check about voters apathy: (I've noticed that on multiple occasion writing witness category posts). Check after payout how many people who voted on this post or even commented on it are actually voting for at least one witness ;-)

Sort:  

I have no problem with @Drakos' witness info page - it is perfectly usable and it's content promotes understanding of what witnesses are doing, since the stats that relate to them are laid bare. It really isn't a problem to paginate a long-ish list, amazon, ebay and most other major sites have no problems with lists that are massively longer. You can check out the way I have presented the data from the 90000(ish) active weekly voters on Steem at Steem Ocean for some basic examples of how large data sets of Steem accounts can be made more palatable. I haven't really even done much there yet, it's just getting started.

I haven't done much analysis on voter engagement, yeah, I will take a look at that in a few days! Thanks for your comment.

btw, we might also ask "how many top witnesses come and discuss witness related topics that have strong community interest?" (such as this one or the others posted about copyright and child pornography).. I actually only recall you participating and someguy123. Apathy has many forms it seems!