curators for statistics would be enough 0.01%. Their role could be fulfilled by a recommender mechanism, which sorts content not to the glory of the popularity totalizator, but by interestingness for each
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
No idea what you're trying to say here, sorry. Maybe your translator turned it into gibberish? I hope the implied 'recommender mechanism' works better.
Да, переводчики далеки от совершенства:)
Идея в том, что попытка переложить рекомендательную функцию на акционеров пока даёт малоинтересные результаты. А главное в соцсетях - не попсовое, а интересное каждому отдельному, и это не тэги и лайки, а скорее художественность, стилистика и смешное. Живые кураторы как алгоритм в этом деле пока не взлетают
Ah yes. Part of the intent behind the EIP is to improve the incentives so that stake-weighted consensus does better at Trending the content people are engaging with, instead of only Trending the content that people are paying for votes on.
I have hope that it will work, but hope is not a strategy.