You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Theory: How to side-step soft-consensus

in #steem4 years ago

This makes me think it might be possible to predict a beneficial shuffle formation:

https://steemit.com/steem/@dantheman/steem-witness-scheduling-algorithm

Especially this point:

After 21 witnesses have been selected, they are shuffled using the block time as a seed to a random number generator.

Sort:  

Yes that would be a major improvement. So you think it might be possible that if a libre witness is randomly assigned to spot 21 of 21, they could create a block that makes the below-20 witness mine first in the subsequent block?

Is there any protection to the other top 20 witnesses pretending the libre witness was offline and discarding those blocks?

Is there any protection to the other top 20 witnesses pretending the libre witness was offline and discarding those blocks?

I believe they are already "protected" otherwise that would cause a fork.

Oh wow. Great find. I can’t believe you were able to dig that up.