Unfortunatley the bigger accounts do have the most say
Unfortunately, or fortunately? Shouldn't the people that are committed to building within the community, and to growing their stake have the most say?
This is already the status quo everywhere. In developing countries it's 'corruption' and in developed countries it's 'lobbying' and 'special interest groups'. At least on Steem we are honest about and it codified it as 'stake-weighted consensus'. If the people with the most to lose are the one's making the important decisions (including the decision of which content deserves rewards) that makes the blockchain the least likely to fail.
Put another way... if Steem made critical decisions by popular vote instead of stake-weighted consensus, it most likely would have already failed.
Can you use #palnet tag in your post? I love to curate your posts with PAL. I believe @palnet community will like your contents too.
Thanks for the reminder! I have been using #palnet tags (and curating there) in most cases. This time I forgot.
I don't think that adding the tag will make the votes before it was added count on palnet, but I have added the tag now.