You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Learning to love the voting power equilibrium point change

in #steem8 years ago

The mathematics are sound, but this proposal is at complete odds with the reality of Steemit. Today, Steemit is heading towards more diverse content because there are a handful of human curators who spend time, dig for good content, and upvote several posts a day.

This proposal massively disincentivizes actual curators, and transfers power over to casual curators who vote less 5 posts per day. These are the type of users who check out what's trending and vote on what they like.

Net result - the curation community will come to a halt, the Trending page be more predictable than it ever was.

Sort:  

Yes I think this is a very undesireable effect.

The trending page is the first thing non-users will see.

OTOH...we can always see what effect it will have in practice. People might not care. Though there does seem to be a strong tendency for users to vote-as-bet.