The working group got involved in the design of a proposal?
No, some members of the working group gave input on three proposals that combined their proposals into one. As well as agreeing to be on the “steering group” that would help it be implemented, if it was chosen by the community.
Yea... But no. A big no no
Why? They shouldn’t help to give the community multiple options? I’ve answered quite a few questions about proposals along the way and gave advice.. was that not acceptable? Or is the issue just having the names listed there for transparency?
As a former auditor, we were always taught that we had to not only be independent, but look independent.
Oh good! We actually need auditors for the upcoming election, as that’s not what the working group is.
But we do have an open community election coming up which will be audited by anyone who wants to. Maybe you can help with that, this process sure could use more volunteers
As for “elections”, simply holding votes doesn’t make it democratic.
How about having an on chain open election, with full real time audits availabile as well as work done to ensure every voice was heard? I’m sure that’s not democratic either...
Turnout was very low
Compared to what? The previous elections that have been done here? Have you been helping get the word out to ensure more of the community is heard? Many have 🙂
Finally, aren’t you the chair person?
Who? The Steem Alliance account? It’s just an account. I’m the current chair, yep. Did you have a question?