You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal

in #steem5 years ago (edited)

I thought you guys just announced being out of beta and being out of survival mode? These three proposals are impeding(1), disruptive(2) and futile (3) respectively.

  1. Good idea but not as is and not on its own. It hurts new accounts and without a peer solution that aids new accounts, for example with rewards for pulling in advertising revenues, imparting platform growth is not a price we should be willing to pay for solving this problem. Further, see my comments on @vandeberg his post.
  2. Please warn us 14 weeks before implementing this "feature". One week for retracting our delegations and 13 weeks for a full power down. This feature fucks over content providers who arguably create value for the platform, to create more revenues for bid bot owners and the like. If this feature gets implemented I'm out of here. It's a platform killer. Seriously it is!
  3. Wrong solution. Instead do something about false reputation. We hardly flag because we know crap content providers will just bidbot themselves bulletproof and then once they are, retaliate any flags we have them. Find a way to exclude bidbot votes from reputation building, then hardfork all existing false reputation out of the blockchain. That will remove our hesitance to flag crap posts more than a separate pool would.