I think our current system is fine and eventually we will get more and better investors and more and better users.
There will always be people who want to game the system when votes are worth money.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think our current system is fine and eventually we will get more and better investors and more and better users.
There will always be people who want to game the system when votes are worth money.
You contradict, or dont want to see the realities, or simply dont look at what happens on the Steem blockchain. For more than 10 months I'm curating the Steem blockchain, seeing all the posts (well, title, image, and first sentence) of some of the tags like #music, and open at least 100 posts every single day. What I see is those users who start out at Steemit writing great articles, stop writing them, or become inactive. I also see the amount of spamming and copy/paste increasing by the day. In parallel, more and more users, even those with good intentions, are joining the game of selling and buying votes.
Your thought on eventually all will be good; How do you see this happening when users who try to do good, either stop their activities or join the gaming of the system?
This guys search is over. He's found a bidbot to up-vote all his comments with and he's happy.
It's in the name hahaha
lol
Yeah, but as far as I get it, what Kevin advocates is 'alignment of incentives' so even such phenomena like votes trading, buttbots ... growth to pump growth of the value of the system - for the rich AND the poor, be it slower for the later. All the donkeys to pull into one direction - the biggest and the smallest.
I think he wants a 50-50 program. I doubt that would get rid of the bots and might even make the bots more lucrative than they are now. Also we do need content. We already have a bunch of autovoters with only the 25% program.
You might want to sign up for @dustweeper.