Another 2 million STEEM was powered up by @steemit2 to @misterdelegation yesterday. One week ago, this account also received 5 million STEEM from @steemit2.
- misterdelegation has delegated 3,118,909.850 SP to @trendings-grace
- misterdelegation has delegated 1,006,965.464 SP to @steemcleaners
- misterdelegation has delegated 507,196.183 SP to @sndbox
- misterdelegation is only voting on @ned's posts. This doesn't drain the reward pool, because @ned declined the payouts on his posts.
- I assume the account is owned by Steemit Inc.
Largest 'power ups' yesterday
Another 240,177 STEEM was 'powered up' by @tamim. Nice! :)
Daily Amount of Steem Powered UP & DOWN

Date | Powered UP | Powered DOWN | Difference |
2017-10-02 | 2,356,078 STEEM | 76,505 STEEM | 2,279,573 STEEM |
2017-10-01 | 62,487 STEEM | 176,965 STEEM | -114,478 STEEM |
2017-09-30 | 52,310 STEEM | 46,449 STEEM | 5,861 STEEM |
2017-09-29 | 145,602 STEEM | 516,785 STEEM | -371,183 STEEM |
2017-09-28 | 100,095 STEEM | 113,273 STEEM | -13,178 STEEM |
2017-09-27 | 139,303 STEEM | 474,774 STEEM | -335,471 STEEM |
2017-09-26 | 81,524 STEEM | 178,911 STEEM | -97,387 STEEM |
Average p/d | 265,833 STEEM | 240,992 STEEM | 24,841 STEEM |
Daily Steem Stats Report - Tuesday, October 03, 2017
All data comes directly from the Steem blockchain and is based on UTC time.
1. Daily number of Posts (including comments)

Date | Posts |
2017-10-02 | 87,055 |
2017-10-01 | 93,189 |
2017-09-30 | 93,091 |
2017-09-29 | 97,811 |
2017-09-28 | 93,661 |
2017-09-27 | 98,481 |
2017-09-26 | 97,438 |
2. Daily number of votes

Date | Votes |
2017-10-02 | 380,064 |
2017-10-01 | 512,130 |
2017-09-30 | 359,813 |
2017-09-29 | 385,077 |
2017-09-28 | 388,259 |
2017-09-27 | 398,127 |
2017-09-26 | 358,932 |
3. Daily active users

Date | Active users |
2017-10-02 | 29,778 |
2017-10-01 | 29,397 |
2017-09-30 | 28,744 |
2017-09-29 | 31,265 |
2017-09-28 | 31,412 |
2017-09-27 | 30,528 |
2017-09-26 | 29,368 |
4. Posts + Comments per post

Date | Average # comments | Posts |
2017-10-02 | 2.91 | 22,263 |
2017-10-01 | 3.26 | 21,892 |
2017-09-30 | 3.03 | 23,079 |
2017-09-29 | 3.21 | 23,256 |
2017-09-28 | 2.85 | 24,327 |
2017-09-27 | 2.78 | 26,053 |
2017-09-26 | 2.77 | 25,875 |
5. New accounts created

Date | New Accounts |
2017-10-02 | 894 |
2017-10-01 | 300 |
2017-09-30 | 293 |
2017-09-29 | 470 |
2017-09-28 | 1,117 |
2017-09-27 | 1,307 |
2017-09-26 | 2,302 |
6. Daily Amount of SBD converted to Steem

Date | Amount in SBD |
2017-10-02 | 17,053 SBD |
2017-10-01 | 2,193 SBD |
2017-09-30 | 1,491 SBD |
2017-09-29 | 11,505 SBD |
2017-09-28 | 1,883 SBD |
2017-09-27 | 2,832 SBD |
2017-09-26 | 1,825 SBD |
7. Daily Steem Transfers from and to exchanges

Date | From Bittrex | From Poloniex | To Bittrex | To Poloniex |
2017-10-02 | 141,702 STEEM | 95,477 STEEM | 155,878 STEEM | 95,921 STEEM |
2017-10-01 | 138,882 STEEM | 112,995 STEEM | 187,819 STEEM | 111,748 STEEM |
2017-09-30 | 295,091 STEEM | 213,701 STEEM | 454,365 STEEM | 114,769 STEEM |
2017-09-29 | 332,752 STEEM | 345,576 STEEM | 567,180 STEEM | 237,778 STEEM |
2017-09-28 | 54,393 STEEM | 286,313 STEEM | 391,376 STEEM | 58,639 STEEM |
2017-09-27 | 66,454 STEEM | 211,649 STEEM | 370,287 STEEM | 15,733 STEEM |
2017-09-26 | 42,807 STEEM | 162,062 STEEM | 168,407 STEEM | 5,084 STEEM |
8. Steem Price Update


¯\___(ツ)____/¯ Follow me @penguinpablo for daily Steem statistics.
Yo are the ¨Vigilante¨ of Steemit, thank you for your work @penguinpablo
Really good information and thank you for keeping a close eye on this. Steemit Inc is definitely getting their ducks in a row for the future. I'm still quite perplexed as to how the Steem price can take such a big correction downward when more Steem is being bought than sold. I realize Steem moves with BTC as most cryptos, but the disparity between Steem bought and sold was quite substantial and the price still fell out of the bucket. Was hoping Steem would find support and hold the 1.40 mark.
@penguinpablo I am proud to see there is a report on the development of steemit
and I can see the statistics you share in the post, pointing out the steeply increased development of steemit. this can be proven by the average of accounts that do PowerUp and PowerDown.
thank you for the report.
It is indeed a Great Development, Looking forward to seeing the community Benefit largely from this.
I'll be honest I was scared on that giant powerup. I really hope you're right and there are no "conspiracies" in the background in order to give huge power to shady individuals in the network.
Thanks for the stats, as usual, anyway, I'm glad to see we're about to stabilize near the 30k daily active users.
Also, what was that sudden spike of half a million daily votes? Any ideas?
A weird spike in the daily votes indeed. I think it's done by voting-bots.
For fuck's sake, someone should purge those. I'm active for barely more than a week but I have enough of them already.
This is unacceptable. This kind of stuff is detrimental and cancerous, I can't believe anyone lets it happen.
This is an interesting question, I would also like to know who invests this money.
Since Steemit is still small and fragile , every major BIG investor should also post a single post and say why it does this and why she or he is here.
Back up. Purge them? Why? And what makes you think that is even possible?
Every vote on the steem blockchain is made by a human. Some humans use computer programs to make a lot of votes based on an algorithm - but a human being is the reason for all of them. Do you think there is some gatekeeper here who “lets” people exercise free expression?
Why? Because their vote represent no real value or opinion, and as such are worthless regarding the help of rising content that are accepted and appreciated through consensus.
Is it possible? I don't know, and of course if it isn't, then I'm not calling for governance or something. I just want the value of Steemit to be more apparent, rather than letting bots express automated responses.
Yes, humans are who behind these algorithms. But the votes aren't coming from them.
And finally, again, no, I'm not demanding governance. With bots, Steemit is still democratic, but represents false values. Not a single person I heard expressing he won't read "trending" because bots make uninteresting bots rise.
We need more whales and investors in Steemit.
Those are really the great numbers.
I am very happy with the information you provide, this information can add my insight to steemit
I am proud to see any progress reports
and I can see the statistics you share in the post, showing the steepest development of steemit. This can be proved by the average of accounts that do PowerUp and PowerDown.
thank you for the report and useful information
Regardless of whether it's bots or the Steemit owners, this is super fishy....
Thanks for you update your post..
Thanks :) @penguinpablo would be great to integrate those stats into the steemnow.com too :) why not?
Wao it's osm work I try to your type work but I can't
Plz visit my blog see my some stupid stuff thankyou sir
Thank you for the update
thank you for the update.
Upvoted and resteem :)
Very good post @penguinpablo . . 👍👍
Great post friend
it is great to see some of the workings behind the scenes -- rock on
How powerful @trendings-grace is.
Thank you @penguinpablo for your findings re-transfers of millions of Steem. A sigh of relief.
I think the same that this account is owned by Steemit Inc. Awesome idea :D
Wow! Thats a lot of Stats. Nice to see how STEEM is doing.
Big boys loading up because they know this will be well above these values??!?
steem 1000 dolar olunca satacağım çünkü 1000 adet aldım.
satınca 1000x1000=1 000 000 dolar eder güzel bi tatil yaparım.
all the big powerups are a good thing and steem power staying on the platform is as well but I am concerned about the lack of accounts being created...
it strikes me as being really low
This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the second half of Oct 03. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $14.12 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Oct 03 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.