I'm not sure if it's constitutional or a monarchy. It's definitely similar to parliamentary (witnesses are members of parliament voted in by users of the system).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm not sure if it's constitutional or a monarchy. It's definitely similar to parliamentary (witnesses are members of parliament voted in by users of the system).
I rethought about it, and ned controls enough SP through his and STINC's (that is his) accounts to control the list of witnesses.
He does not do it explicitly, but since he controls his and STINC's (that is his) delegations, he still has influence over his delegatees votes.
If ned wished, it would not even be corporatism.
This comment has received a 49.50 % upvote from @steemdiffuser thanks to: @stimialiti.
Bids above 0.05 SBD may get additional upvotes from our trail members.
Get Upvotes, Join Our Trail, or Delegate Some SP