Oh, do your comments there bring back memories of being nobody till I gave you a lift? I thought so.
But at least this time you tried your attack in your own name, instead of hiding like the fraud you and your buddies are behind a real classy spoof account. @sircock - well done. I seem to recall your words on that were:
"I wish I was famous enough to have somebody spoof me"
I'm just sitting back watching your ego devour the world around you. Keep dying on every hill you cross, that's why you're friendless, alone, and well past your prime.
Gosh what a thread to dig through hunting a mention. Mercy!
I still love my choice for witness team alignment, despite the controversy. I kept waiting to for those who warned me to be proven right, and Cork to be proven base of character the way they claim. As time went on, the inverse became true based on the behaviors I saw with my own eyes.
People can "claim" anything they want. For my own personal knowledge, I asked the one guy claiming Cork owes him money for the dogs if he would offer proof. He didn't just fail to do so, he flat-out refused. Publicly, in front of many witnesses. Yet still this is an issue? How? For me, the fact that Cork needed money to care for the animals he committed to says more about his character than that of any self-righteous accuser. It demonstrates loyalty and a clear understanding of ethical responsibility.
Then we get back to the moral code of the people in question. First, none of the people involved with @noblewitness or @thewritersblockever engaged in divisive conduct. We included everyone in everything. Shared members, shared moderators. Shared witness support. No one can argue that Cork says things in the most diplomatic manner, because clearly he doesn't. But I've yet to see him be proven wrong about any points he's made. Others, however...wow. The behaviors! Licentious remarks in public forums. The creation of an entire Steem account to mock an accidental misspelling of Cork's name that was downright vulgar. Is there no sense of shame with some people? What about publicly ridiculing a person's appearance after they took chemotherapy and years of immunosuppressants? Yet somehow all of this is okay? But wait--the best (or worst, depending on which camp a person is in,) is the blatant edict by a community leader for his entire drone army to disassociate from Cork and any initiatives he's part of. This edict came with the express threat of removing delegations and all support from anyone who affiliates with him. And the whole drone army concurred that this was acceptable. And yet, this is okay?
Talk about centralized! It's the antithesis of everything the blockchain is supposed to represent. Bottom line is that no one associated with @sircorkever, at any time, forbade anyone else from affiliating with "those other folks," participating in their servers, voting their witness, or following their blogs. We encouraged cross-promotion and teamwork. Then suddenly there it is, in writing, that the leader of the largest community on Discord has forbidden "his people" from association with Cork or Noblewitness. What the absolute hell, people? HOW is ANY of this not a thousand times worse than any lip Cork ever gave anyone? Yet they get a free pass for this egregious and downright insidious behavior?
Not from me, they don't. Never have I been more pleased about where I chose to place my alliance. I'll take Cork's lip over corrupt character any day.
Instead of starting a charity to impress a woman that hates you to help people thousands of miles away that you don't care about, why don't you pay back the person who loaned you hundreds of dollars so you could keep your dogs alive?
Oh you mean the person who demanded many times I DO NOT pay him back for his GIFT, until his lack of relevance gave him the grand plan to use it as a tool which backfired badly?
Do you pay back the woman who lets you live in her basement?
Try again maybe?
Or maybe try to do something of use, at all? Like getting a job?
Mr. @noblewitness, why is it you assume only one person loaned you money to pay your vet bills? You're not privy to half the conversation anymore, but others are.
LOLz, keep trying, no one "LOANED" anyone anything. But PAL and it's little increasingly irrelevant clique have never been strong on honesty or credibility.
Imagine seeing @sircork having an emotional breakdown on yet another post. This super prominent and most famous Steem witness with a million dollar company yet he needs to borrow money to keep his fucking dogs alive.
You speak like a child. You bring up old conversations in passing as if they were some amazing favor by the Dalai Lama when in reality you are an old, tired, broken down man that never matured because of fetal alcohol syndrome.
Don't you carry @fyrstikken balls in your hands for him? He is being nice to @ned so you should be doing the same thing or risk losing that teet you have been sucking on but yet unable to procure milk from.
A shit head who made you relevant when I insisted you be included in this reward:
https://steemit.com/minnowsupportproject/@danielsaori/yes-msp-medal-of-honor
And gave you this platform to exist on, though still nobody knows your name...
https://steemit.com/mspwaves/@aggroed/a-bromode-bro-ode-to-sircork-and-his-time-machine-mspwaves-radio-sponsored-by-lovejuice
Oh, do your comments there bring back memories of being nobody till I gave you a lift? I thought so.
But at least this time you tried your attack in your own name, instead of hiding like the fraud you and your buddies are behind a real classy spoof account. @sircock - well done. I seem to recall your words on that were:
"I wish I was famous enough to have somebody spoof me"
Sit down Clown.
I'm just sitting back watching your ego devour the world around you. Keep dying on every hill you cross, that's why you're friendless, alone, and well past your prime.
!popcorn
So I take you all aren't working together as a team, running a witness anymore? That didn't last very long. :(
Not sure what you mean. I've never ran a witness by myself or with anyone else. You must have me confused with someone else.
Ah! I did indeed. Thanks for clarifying. I got confused with @rhondak.
Gosh what a thread to dig through hunting a mention. Mercy!
I still love my choice for witness team alignment, despite the controversy. I kept waiting to for those who warned me to be proven right, and Cork to be proven base of character the way they claim. As time went on, the inverse became true based on the behaviors I saw with my own eyes.
People can "claim" anything they want. For my own personal knowledge, I asked the one guy claiming Cork owes him money for the dogs if he would offer proof. He didn't just fail to do so, he flat-out refused. Publicly, in front of many witnesses. Yet still this is an issue? How? For me, the fact that Cork needed money to care for the animals he committed to says more about his character than that of any self-righteous accuser. It demonstrates loyalty and a clear understanding of ethical responsibility.
Then we get back to the moral code of the people in question. First, none of the people involved with @noblewitness or @thewritersblock ever engaged in divisive conduct. We included everyone in everything. Shared members, shared moderators. Shared witness support. No one can argue that Cork says things in the most diplomatic manner, because clearly he doesn't. But I've yet to see him be proven wrong about any points he's made. Others, however...wow. The behaviors! Licentious remarks in public forums. The creation of an entire Steem account to mock an accidental misspelling of Cork's name that was downright vulgar. Is there no sense of shame with some people? What about publicly ridiculing a person's appearance after they took chemotherapy and years of immunosuppressants? Yet somehow all of this is okay? But wait--the best (or worst, depending on which camp a person is in,) is the blatant edict by a community leader for his entire drone army to disassociate from Cork and any initiatives he's part of. This edict came with the express threat of removing delegations and all support from anyone who affiliates with him. And the whole drone army concurred that this was acceptable. And yet, this is okay?
Talk about centralized! It's the antithesis of everything the blockchain is supposed to represent. Bottom line is that no one associated with @sircork ever, at any time, forbade anyone else from affiliating with "those other folks," participating in their servers, voting their witness, or following their blogs. We encouraged cross-promotion and teamwork. Then suddenly there it is, in writing, that the leader of the largest community on Discord has forbidden "his people" from association with Cork or Noblewitness. What the absolute hell, people? HOW is ANY of this not a thousand times worse than any lip Cork ever gave anyone? Yet they get a free pass for this egregious and downright insidious behavior?
Not from me, they don't. Never have I been more pleased about where I chose to place my alliance. I'll take Cork's lip over corrupt character any day.
And by the way, his dogs are wonderful.
Don't confuse above average performance with your lack of ability to perform. That's not ego or hubris, it's just the cold truth of your life.
Instead of starting a charity to impress a woman that hates you to help people thousands of miles away that you don't care about, why don't you pay back the person who loaned you hundreds of dollars so you could keep your dogs alive?
Oh you mean the person who demanded many times I DO NOT pay him back for his GIFT, until his lack of relevance gave him the grand plan to use it as a tool which backfired badly?
Do you pay back the woman who lets you live in her basement?
Try again maybe?
Or maybe try to do something of use, at all? Like getting a job?
Mr. @noblewitness, why is it you assume only one person loaned you money to pay your vet bills? You're not privy to half the conversation anymore, but others are.
LOLz, keep trying, no one "LOANED" anyone anything. But PAL and it's little increasingly irrelevant clique have never been strong on honesty or credibility.
r0nd0n (57)
Perfectonist
985 followers
Joined September 2016
How's that "perfectionism" working out for you, clown?
Doesn't matter what you say, no one will see you anyway...
985 Total followers
630 Dead followers
355 True followers
You spelled "perfectionist" wrong, but you'll claim "clown humor" lol, fail.
Imagine seeing @sircork having an emotional breakdown on yet another post. This super prominent and most famous Steem witness with a million dollar company yet he needs to borrow money to keep his fucking dogs alive.
You speak like a child. You bring up old conversations in passing as if they were some amazing favor by the Dalai Lama when in reality you are an old, tired, broken down man that never matured because of fetal alcohol syndrome.
Don't you carry @fyrstikken balls in your hands for him? He is being nice to @ned so you should be doing the same thing or risk losing that teet you have been sucking on but yet unable to procure milk from.