Do not underestimate the egoism and stupidity of people.
If people would behave the way you need them to, so that your proposals would work we would not have a problem yet.
So to come to the problem's core and say it out loud: the big whale accounts atm do not curate and support in a way the majority of steemians feels supportive...
so every action that is a working one would be to take voting power away from them and redistribute to small accounts.. for me this is not an option! This would be a kind of revolution and destroy trust in the platform for a long time! (and then the gaming starts again with many small bot controlled accounts..)
.. I very well see the trouble of the current state but I did not see a working solution in any of the proposals..
steem is POS or dPOS.. and if you do not force any change in those staked power more or less nothing will change..
.. the only option that could make a little difference - at least IMHO - is that vote delegation and VOTING bots are killed...
whoever doesn't do manual curation just looses that voting power back to the pool automatically leveraging the other manual curation efforts...
The only thing that might work - again just IMHO - that simulates redistribution could be a kind of higher inflation trajectory and higher overall ultimate steem amount limit... better then just taking away one's possession in a single stepp... but then we would be doing what the fiat national banksters are doing..
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Nope. There are 17 of them active. there are 1.3 million accounts.