You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why our way of distributing Steem by voting sucks, why it does not scale and how we can improve this situation

in #steem • 6 years ago

Great write up. For Steem succeed, the successful delegation of whales (and or orcas + dolphins too) to responsible curators is key.

It's not easy to find great individual curators who consistently vote on content however, esp in a bear market.

6 years ago in #steem by
$0.03
  • Past Payouts $0.03
  • - Author $0.02
  • - Curators $0.01
1 vote
Reply 1
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago (edited) 

    great individual curators who consistently vote on content

    with such single-vote/voting-power delegation system, you do not need to care so much about consistent voting.

    You can delegate you voting power to 30 people you trust, restrict, that they can use your voting power only if you have more than 95% VP... and those 30 people will utilize it according your rules. If 10 people among those 30 will not vote - this is not a problem, because other 20 still will be able to utilize your voting power :)