It seems that I have to study 'ICO laws' on the weekend! :-)
Good to see you in my blog, I still feel guilty for not being part of the Steem Queens panel.
Don't you believe that there's a way of providing an incentive for investments that's not directly related with the rewards distribution? What if we found a way to make curation more attractive than self-voting?
What we definitely don't want is to keep away those who're willing to invest. Still why does influence needs to be pegged to financial possibility in a free, decentralized, open-minded network?
We celebrate providing countries like Venezuela with a new way of securing their assets, but at the same time we don't recognize the opinion of a Venezuelan in our network as long as he doesn't power up a decent amount of money. That's a bit over the top, but you know what I mean..
Is there even a chance to align those interests?