I would like to see this implemented for posts actually. But an exponentially growing cost for posting. The first of the day maybe .001, second 0.01 third 0.1 sbd 4th costs 1 whole SBD 5th post 10 SBD 6th 100 SBD and so forth.
Or maybe a fairer system would be the equivalent measured against % upvote value.
This way spamming becomes prohibitively expensive but it would not overly penalise quality posters who post 4 good posts a day.
Money could go to the @null account like promotion.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It doesn't makes sense 0.01 is enough to prevent spammers.
not for posting, if they can harvest a few dozen SBD per post with autovoting bots 0,01 is laughable and won't stop anything. Posting should have an exponential cost so that a human won't be penalized but a spam bot posting hundreds of posts a day to game the rewards System gets severely punished without human intervention .
I see @Ausbitbank and others trying to flag manually flag spam accounts, but that's like swatting mosquitos and it costs them their voting power which is unfair. You can't solve manually the automated abuses.
There needs to be a systemic built-in circuit breaker on abusive bot behaviour or they will suck this platform dry .
We had this last year, with the 4 post daily maximum.
(Posting more frequently reduced rewards)