Yep. You nailed it. Only a MMO is more engaging than steemit. Not only the community is the single best mass online gathering on the face of Earth; you also get STEEM for your contributions. Even when it's just a few cents, it's still a incentive and it creates a push for quality. Facebook never had a push for quality. Likes or bad comments or downright trolling had no objective consequences. Steemit fixes that.
Quality requires a certain kind of commitment. That could affect the retention. Sometimes I feel like posting something and then back away thinking it might not be good enough for the community. There is a pressure to be great. Also the community has a very small set of interests. Cryptocurrency, individuality, philosophy, travel, technology, psychology, free markets, libertarianism, economics..... things kind of fall into a small set of categories which limit the audience. That's not entirely bad. I mean we don't need liberals and SJWs here, do we?
Some might just make an account and leave it being unable to connect with the community well. I personally hope steemit will never be cursed to grow as big as Facebook as it would diminish the quality of people on steemit. I think steemit has a vibe of productive elitism to it. That's what attracts me. There is no room for cheap stuff. When people have nothing much to contribute, they may simply decide to stay in the sidelines.
good points. The retention seems to a problem because of bad UX. What I feel is the company is more focused on the blockchain and give the UI part to organizations like busy.
I got used pretty quickly. There used to be some problems with things not getting posted or getting double posted etc. DTube can do hell a lot smoother and better. The recent improvements are nice except for the logo. https://steemit.com/steemit/@happymoneyman/3-problems-with-the-new-logo-a-critical-review
At the end of the day it's the fundamentals that matter the worst. Overvalued companies never end well. Undervalued ones at least have a chance and they don't risk being a disaster. Steemit is pretty young. It'll improve. I'm more interested in getting new valuable users. Maybe we'd find good UI designs from them.
I'm pretty sure steemit UI is much better than reddit.
like snap ? :)
I also think UI is fine but when it comes to the UX, it has basic flaws. for example, look at the empty space to the left of this post.
I consider SNAP, TWTR, Uber to be more like charties because they bleed money while providing a service to the customers. I meant the companies with high P/E like Netflix or a crypto like BTC.
The empty space and the long comment threads breaking into different pages are both things to consider. Best discussions can get into multiple pages and most people are going to miss them because they won't be clicking to view the rest of the discussion.
Comments should be given more space. It makes reading easier and instead of reducing the width of comments significantly, they should try some lines connecting the discussion like a thread. That would be really helpful.
It was nice to chat with you. Upvoted and following!
One really neat feature from the now-defunct dailypaul.com was you could click on those vertical lines to the left of the comment (one per level-of-indent), and it would take you up to the comment that started that vertical line! Very helpful in navigating around.
Also, for the "comment header" to indicate the user being replied to, would be helpful.
Definitely agree with the whitespace; the comment I'm reading and this text box I'm typing in are 304 pixels wide, where this browser is 1920 pixels wide! That's 84% whitespace! Quite a waste.
And, this comment might go to "another page" making it far less likely to be read by many (pretty sure you'll take the extra click to read it).
checking the video @vimukthi
also see this :