You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Are You Seeing the Truth? What Is Your Vision of Steem?

in #steem6 years ago (edited)

I stopped taking this post seriously when you stated you know the truth and that you are right. :)

I just see it differently. I am not for the changes.

There is no point in debating with someone that already has decided they are right and they only understand the truth.

Sort:  

Well, I'd say that the arguments matter. Nothing annoying into s.b. stating that he feels he's right. It would be strange if the guy wastes couple of hours to put together a quite consistent and tidy outlay of structured statements and to declare 'i'm not right', or 'i'm not sure i'm right' or 'i don't give a f... if i'm right' :)

That is why it doesn't take an entire paragraph to tell others that you believe in your own view. :)

And to ensure the reader that even if they hold a different view, it is because they don't acknowledge that you are right.

It's not really the way to open a conversation. :) I did get a chuckle out of your comment though.

I don't think Kevin took it personally, he knows I respect him, that is different than agreeing with him. :)

We've just got a flawed economic system that provides the very action we don't want with the highest rewards."

Please wake up!

I am fully awake and I understand that we are still under development. Yes, the whole thing is flawed.

There is no market for this content. Off of steemIt what would this post be worth?

Likely absolutely nothing.

So, if you want to discuss the flaws. The entire thing defies reason. Maybe we should start there.

You just picked a spot to point at. It's your opinion and you are entitled to it. I just see different ways for it to play out.

I'm awake, I disagree respectfully. :) I am happy for your passion though.

It doesn't matter if the post is worth elsewhere or not. Steem is a decentralised organisation and all we're doing here is about an "insider" economy. It's about increasing the chances that Steem is going to the hands of those that are actually investing time and effort in the platform. Oh well that's my take anyway..

I get it that I might be wrong. Just saying that I'm right in my own light like anyone would, as explained.. thanks @whatsup

Yes. if good ... i.e. as you said it is just about alignment of economic incentives ... it would grow like wildfire, snowballing, avalanche - for the good of all, EVEN the poor get richer, does not matter it is slowlier. The trouble is low churn, b.s. content, all these things which make it less attractive.

This comment would have made sense if the December Bubble didn't draw the eyes of the world towards Steemit. If Steemit was still that weird geeky loner sitting quietly on the cyberspace with no media eyes checking it out. I have read your posts and seen your take on matters like this. If such POV prevailed on this platform, bidbutts and whales will keep raping the system, demotivated folks will increase, vast majority will hands up, Dan will replicate the fuck out of Steemit and his secret agents that still happen to be your top witnesses will jump ship. Waiting for Ned's SMTs? Goodluck with that.

I guess we agree to disagree. I am fine with that.