I actually don’t hold an attitude where I’m not not willing to work towards a solution, but I do hold an attitude where I won’t work to undermine a whole community to get what I want or be seen as the hero. I understand how that can be confusing to those who don’t hold that same position.
Many are working to save the Steem community, only a few are so desperate that they will actual make back door deals to ensure they “win” somehow.
How exactly was he undermining "the whole community"?
While we are on the subject of backdoor deals and undermining the community, that sounds awfully similar to a select group of witnesses all colluding in order to launch a soft fork, a soft fork that started all of this garbage.
Get a trustless agreement set up for Justin Sun where there is a trustless guarantee that his stake will not be frozen and the witness stalemate ends.
Why are you trolling me exactly? If you don’t know the situation and how it affected the community, why are you arguing with me about it?
And you mean community selected witnesses who made a decision based on the information they had? Those witnesses who have been elected by stake holders to do just that? Yeah see.. you seem to be missing the basics of how things work here.
His stake isn’t frozen, and there is no reason for the witnesses to guarantee anything. They can choose to run whatever code they feel is best for the chain and the community can show support or distaste for it with their votes, that’s how this system works.
I had the same thougth about the softfork (in which started this whole mess).
Says someone with 60 STEEM stake! LOL.
The size of one's stake doesn't make their point any less correct.
In a DPOS blockchain it does! Especially it shows, that you have no skin in the game. Not to mention you have 5 follower, spam posts (about random countries) and no following.
A point is either correct or incorrect irregardless of the stake. The ability to influence on a DPOS blockchain is directly related to one's stake, perhaps that is what you are getting confused with.
I have 160 SP and I voted up the comment of the 60 SP guy. A guy with 1,600 SP agrees with him. How much Steem Power did Justin Sun control before the soft fork?
I totally understand why Sun would feel his stake was under attack. Now, it is not known what would have happened had the soft-fork not happened. Would he have voted in sock-puppets with his own stake?
Thanks. The argument about SP and point's was a ridiculous one. We will never know what Justin would have done. I have a hunch he would not have taken over the chain, but he could have.