LOL Please, if you only knew what the fuck this asshole did in the past and still denies to this day while blaming the "community" for flagging him, errrm "censoring" him.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
LOL Please, if you only knew what the fuck this asshole did in the past and still denies to this day while blaming the "community" for flagging him, errrm "censoring" him.
Well, I am aware of some of it, both from your own comments and his, earlier.
What I have observed is that @skeptic fought for his account and climbed out of the negative rep, which did censor him.
Censorship doesn't have to be utter and entire. Making your posts invisible is censorship, even if they still exist, and can be found.
I reckon that's admirable, and haven't seen any reason to flag him since I've been a follower. YMMV.
Lotsa folks I follow aren't meek folks that go with the flow, including you. Even particularly you LOL. I kinda like that in folks. I reckon they have the courage of their convictions, while plenty don't.
I don't have to agree with everything someone says to be glad they say it.
a claim without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
oh Hitchens's razor, now he cant claim im trying to say im Hitchens
Skeptic mimicked the Sears guy, but he did not reproduce Sears work word for word; therefore his work is a parody of Sears work, but a reference to Sears would be preferable and Skeptic has remedied his omission.
FYI, if you understand the definition that you pasted then you should understand that Sears work is satire: he created humour about a sjw without reproducing the sjw directly!
Maybe, instead of being so aggressive, you could have just pointed out, politely, to skeptic that he should reference Sears.
You guys have history, but really, to the casual observer, the way you have conducted yourself in these comments simply smacks of desperation: that you are desperate for him to look bad so that you can look/feel good.
Seriously, can you not see the irony?
At this point I have to agree with skeptic that your comprehension skills are somewhat lacking. You read a definition and your understanding of it is completely wrong even when given a clear example. Stew in your ignorance or have someone sit down with you and explain it- I give up.
No, he didn't reproduce it word for word. Listen to the video and read skeptic's work and you will find that he cut it down considerably and made it more suitable for steemit.
You keep laughing because you need to lighten up.
Expect no more replies from me and feel free to have the last word.
you keep posting the the quote but yout dont seem to understand it still.
lol
what the hell else would you call the post? i was mimicing the concept and ideas jp sears was making in his original content. that is the definition of parody by your own definition. smfh
and that was what the original creator of what i parodied was doing.
same with your censorship logic, you do not seem to understand the definition of censorship or just words in general or your willing to ignore them to push your narritive.
censorship is
it does not matter if it is still there if it has been suppresed it is still censorship.
but please do continue telling us how the definitions of words are what they are.
LMFAO!
LMAFO!
Your understanding of words is amazing pleas do tell us more.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
please provide links as evidence because you are the holder of the burden by making claims.
a claim without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
"THUH COMUNNITY!!!!!!!"
LMFAO!!!
yes i want links to evidence and not the pathetic steemit.com/@skeptic is the link to it bullshit, give actual links to the evidence to back up your claims and i will then provide evidence proving you wrong or full of shit as thats all this has been for the last 8 months with you.
i am getting a good laugh out this desplay of yours.
