You're starting a story about Vandeberg's motives out of the blue as if we should be familiar with what he did, as if you know what he thought, without any evidence, without indicating how certain you are about this. I'm missing the backstory of the backstory.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
There is nothing true about this .. in fact I’m wondering if inertia is working on his fiction writing or something, as this is completely confusing ..
Yup.