I sure am glad you came along, I been looking for those numbers for months.
Can we get the delegation numbers?
Who delegates to whom and what effects on distribution results from that.
My content has not been well received, despite bringing some of the most informative infobombs on the platform.
(look for yourself, if you find somebody with more content depth than me let me know I want to add them to my steemvoter. We should exclude gavvet, sweetssj, kernl, kingscrown, v4vapid, and on occasion stellabelle, those people bring it every time, imo.)
It was made clear to me at it's inception that @curie was not gonna vote for me, and the uppercrust has exhibited solidarity in that position, albeit potentially for their own reasons separate from @curie.
I got real butthurt when the platform claims to support free speech when the facts are that they only support conforming speech, no free thinkers need to apply unless they happen to conform to the goals of the upper crust.
Apparently my content does not qualify.
I predicted that allowing delegation would just institutionalize curie and make the insiders that much more difficult to resist.
When whales vote everybody else loses influence.
So, when a whale delegates to somebody else we get the same circlejerk that is @curie, except where we can't see it as easily.
Do you intend to make your search engine available as asksteem.com has, perhaps add it to steemtools.com for easy access?
I also wonder about exposing who votes for whom month over month.
Who is circlejerking the reward pool?
You have exposed the blatant self voters, now can we expose the second level self voters, too?
I never did like the idea of ganging up to reward the select few in the gang.
I opposed it from the beginning.
Thanks for giving me the data to support my position.
Not yet, it's an even larger project then. The so called "circlejerks" and self-voting with multiple accounts is indeed my next target. But that's much more complicated, so don't expect it any time soon :)
Wonderful!