It might not pay yet but that's still reaching a very high number of individual voters which is good for getting the word out and gaining reputation points.
I know the feeling though. 441 votes is really good regardless of payout.
Does that make a difference? My income model for this was mostly using the accounts to promote the posts and make a few $, and add premium services, which so far not many are interested in. So I am debating if it is worth the effort.
develop the premium services and I will be happy to promote steemvoter allot, I want to promote it now but does not seem right for you to be giving it away as only a free service
The only use I see and exploit in steemvoter is the possibility of "featuring" authors one likes even when one does not have the time to "check" their posts on a daily basis.
If that reported into a loss for me, then, I would not do it.
On the other hand, I believe that curation rewards are pitiful compared to what a shitpost consisting in some youtube link copypasta makes. Knowing this, I'd try to work in an "autopost" configurable bot that'd grab data off a user setup RSS. By only getting one upvote with this means, it'd be way more profitable than curating.
It might not pay yet but that's still reaching a very high number of individual voters which is good for getting the word out and gaining reputation points.
I know the feeling though. 441 votes is really good regardless of payout.
They are... automated votes, heh.
Yea. A bunch of them are but not all.
Does that make a difference? My income model for this was mostly using the accounts to promote the posts and make a few $, and add premium services, which so far not many are interested in. So I am debating if it is worth the effort.
develop the premium services and I will be happy to promote steemvoter allot, I want to promote it now but does not seem right for you to be giving it away as only a free service
The only use I see and exploit in steemvoter is the possibility of "featuring" authors one likes even when one does not have the time to "check" their posts on a daily basis.
If that reported into a loss for me, then, I would not do it.
On the other hand, I believe that curation rewards are pitiful compared to what a shitpost consisting in some youtube link copypasta makes. Knowing this, I'd try to work in an "autopost" configurable bot that'd grab data off a user setup RSS. By only getting one upvote with this means, it'd be way more profitable than curating.