It is just irresponsible shilling. Read your posts again lol.
Could you even get a clue that I explained a scenario when a person invests $400 and $2 a day in blogging effort, so basically they have risked nearly nothing for the shot at up to a $million in 5 years. How the heck do you compute that as irresponsible?
Explain why it is irresponsible? Develop your argument with a detailed explanation. Who am I responsible for? Do you mean to imply that readers are too stupid to analyze my blog post and make their own decision of the merits? Thus I am responsible for them as if they are my children?
I don’t see what is irresponsible in terms of explaining the different ways the Steem investment can be analyzed. The entire point of discussion is to consider various perspectives.
Rather I think the issue here is you are a troll who can’t make a cogent point. Are you advocating not explaining to people about the compounding feature of Steem? Are you advocating not presenting the market capitalization of Facebook as a comparison? And why?
Could you even get a clue that I explained a scenario when a person invests $400 and $2 a day in blogging effort, so basically they have risked nearly nothing for the shot at up to a $million in 5 years. How the heck do you compute that as irresponsible?
Explain why it is irresponsible? Develop your argument with a detailed explanation. Who am I responsible for? Do you mean to imply that readers are too stupid to analyze my blog post and make their own decision of the merits? Thus I am responsible for them as if they are my children?
I don’t see what is irresponsible in terms of explaining the different ways the Steem investment can be analyzed. The entire point of discussion is to consider various perspectives.
Rather I think the issue here is you are a troll who can’t make a cogent point. Are you advocating not explaining to people about the compounding feature of Steem? Are you advocating not presenting the market capitalization of Facebook as a comparison? And why?