I was asking @haejin to answer. Do you have the authority to speak for the man. The preservation of Steem as a community is most sustainable if everyone works together for the benefit of all. Just like a real community without a governing body would operate. This is a lofty goal as personal rewards are involved and human nature is to be greedy for ones own personal gain so maybe the experiment will fail. It most certainly would fail if 50-100 more people were behaving in this manner.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well, if everyone is gonna share nice, then this should change, right?
All for one, one for all!
Well, not according to rewards.
Where's Waldo... err Uh I mean haejin?
it s already hard enough to find a chart on a specific coin he put out 10 days ago it would be near impossible if everything was under one post each day.
It would be easier. Go to the post from 10 days ago, look for that coin. All in one post. Let your browser do that search. As long as steemit has no working search function
From anarchy to a community of anarchists with a leader who is also an anarchist haha.
I was not answering for him. I don’t even know him. I was simply posing a question in response to your comment.
In response to the additional point you raised, this is exactly how a community without a governing body would operate. It’s called anarchism. The idealised society that wish to create doesn’t exist. Steemit is proof of that.
It’s true! If we all behave this way, will the people currently doing it still feel it’s justifies?
As beautiful as your writing and beautiful
I see your post.
i will read your articles every day from today.
promised.
please follow me and give me a vote kindly