Faucets are a common practice when people give away their own money. In this case votes allocate money from the reward pool which belong not to the poster, but to the community. As such, all in the community are entitled to protect the pool as their conscience dictates, which is exactly what @liondani did there. If I had seen it I would have done the same.
If there are other cases where you think @liondani acted inappropriately then point them out specifically. Making vague allegations without facts helps no one.
I disagree with you and see no difference in offering anything for upvotes and comments. And a faucet is a valid way to bring people to the community because once on the site it is very likely they will do other activities.
Downvoting gives those with too much power to be the judge and jury. So even when other disagree, our pinions are meaningless when crushed by one person with too much power.
Downvoting gives those with too much power to be the judge and jury
Right this is the same like what in Turky happens
Why downvoting simply make a Reply an say what you think about this and other
can upvote ore leaving it or say what he thinks about it
This we are calling in Germany Demokratie!
Downvoting is like censoring and if only the People with much Power can censoring it!
What is it?
We have already an official faucet running from the founders of steemit that gives min $3 to each new registered user!
Faucets are a common practice when people give away their own money
I have paid the first 3 Rounds to all from my Pocket
1.Round 0.10 2. Round 0.02 3. Round 0.02 SD to evrybody!
with over 100 manual Transfers This needs Time and Time is Money too!
I have earned:
Author reward of 0.013 SD and 0.005 STEEM POWER for miketr/steemusdfaucet-round-3