Votes on content that is 7 days old or older, perhaps even 6 days 18 hours or older only cause damage by adding data to the blockchain while not adding a single rshare to the recipient of the vote.
To me it is annoying.
This is why I wrote about the 1 week in my comment to which you replied.
Steemit is garbage since I joined it, but is still my biggest time expenditure, or waste, along Youtube.
Youtube is like TV, but much better, due to much bigger diversity and much more content.
In STEEM you have to reward yourself by using bidbots.
It is risky, and I got downvoted at least 3 times by 3 different people for doing so, but the reward still exceeds the cost by far, and the downvoters did pay with VP, which almost everyone here tries to spare, because it is money and power, especially if you know how to leverage it.
Steemit is a better choice than facebook and Twitter for sure.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You got a 29.13% upvote from @sleeplesswhale courtesy of @stimialiti!
hehe.
If thats the case then something is definitely wrong. This way you can make money on whatever crap you post. So if honest people don't use bitsbots then shitposters just destroy the entire platform.
So that may explain the downvores, yet downvotes then work like censorship, and that would be just as bad as the thing they are trying to fight with downvotes.
And if you then still manage to win then it is just a joke.
How can steemit be 'better' then the other options if people need to reward themselves?
What am i missing here?
You got a 30.00% upvote from @luckyvotes courtesy of @stimialiti!
@youtake pulls you up ! This vote was sent to you by @stimialiti!