"A tool for protecting life, liberty and property" that's a really difficult tasks. Is important to set meaningful goals but we shouldn't forget we are not flawless and as steemit is built by people, the system will follow the behaviour of the mood of the people that build it. Is not good or bad, is just impossible for 3 people to have the same views upon life, liberty and property so no chance for 20 to meet an agreement. I guess the choice you have made is a very good one and make sense if you believe a core value is not in line anymore with your views upon the system. If you cannot change either you can debate or step out and look for something more appealing. Perfection is a tare rather than a quality because doesn't exist. I would still try if I was you :)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think if you asked everyone if they would rather live in a world where their life, liberty and property were protected or a world where those things were not protected (like the world we live in now,) the majority would choose the former. I agree, the HOW is very much up for debate. Which is why innovations, adaptability, transparency, discussion and all the other things that cut the bull, reveal the truth and enable innovation are so important. We need to find the most efficient path. Time is very much a factor and as things currently stand with the world of today, a matter of life and death for millions.