I would have wished, however, that you can not only follow certain people, but which can be divided each his contributions in different categories and gives the opportunity to follow only certain categories. I post as like posts about Bitcoin, Thailand, funny nonsense or articles on my work. But I do not think that anyone wants is interested in Thailand also look for the journal article my work interesting or permanently any, though funny, nonsense from each of its forerunner.
Duration of evaluation and reward
Furthermore, I would hope that the postings can be evaluated permanently. This is also true for the comments, which are sometimes more valuable than the actual post. The dividend should be credited to the account monthly to stay but the total amount listed as orientation of the review.
Type of evaluation and reward
Also there should be a reward not only for the direct evaluation. If an animated discussion arises from a post office, the post office often has a greater value for the project. The number of posts under the post should be included in the evaluation.
You also get a penalty on your payouts if you post more than 4 articles. The current system is incentivizing people to create multiple accounts each focused on a niche rather than a single master account. Maybe this is intended to stop massive content aggregates?
Is the 4 submission rule only for content? I'm curious because I comment a lot.
Of course, it wouldn't be applied to commentaries. That would indeed increase spam in the comment section. But would be a great rule since it would for some time stop spam in created section (until there are more users). People would have to go through bigger trouble to post spam posts and curators would have an easier time reading through new content. The current system seems unholdable if there are say 100000 active users. With 6000+ plus active in last 24 hours one can't read more than 2% of newly created content in his active time and curate it.