You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Helsing: Governance Ideas (Good/Bad whales needed)

in #steemit6 years ago

Is there a way to challenge a down vote by Helsing in a timely manor . In the beginning one wrong down vote could cripple a minnow and the concept . There should be a way to compensate if it happens .

There is a rule when sending out a killer to kill . "never loose oversight on you killer "
How is it going to be monitored ?
I see how to shut it down , If that is required .

Trial is essential !!!!

I Totally agree with Helsing and what needs to be done .

The whales have stake and are the ones who have the most to gain and lose on the platform

This might be true if you only consider total amount in $ . If you compare a persons wealth compared to % invested in Steemit then I'd bet that there are some minnows that have a greater % of their wealth in Steemit then some whales .

Whales are currently well compensated for their stake

Sort:  

In the beginning one wrong down vote could cripple a minnow and the concept .

It cannot have much effect on reputation as it has none (25) itself. However in regards to rewards, it culd only ever take as much as a post is worth. So, if wrongly flagged, it would be likely one post max. However to begin with, I don't think it would come close to flagging minnows and the cases it dealt with would be very obvious.

That clears up some of my concerns and makes sense .
The cases it deals with would be the key and the main reason to support it .
I like the idea and concept . It is needed as long as it has checks and balances and not abused .