The question is: if he had voted positively, would there be this post and these comments? 🤔🤔🤔
Why, just as there are people on the team voting negatively, there are several other team members voting positively!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
There are other team members that are voting both for and against. However the difference would be if they are in a position of leadership of the organization.
So in my eyes (my opinion), he should've refrained from voting on an issue with the community like Yaba and Aggy did. They showed great leadership skills by giving the community the power to decide. Aly on the other hand did not.
But of course he does have the right to vote however he wants. He may feel the negative message it sends to the community that voted for it is irrelevant to his bigger objective he had for voting for it. Hopefully we find out.
I understand. Surely, he will speak out. I hope he uses his personal profile for that and does not use Yaba or Aggroed to transmit his message. What is left for us is to wait.
I completely agree All leader of Splinterlands and big investors should not get any votes in what players want in this game they make so many decisions that we do not have any say in.
If you keep the many actual players happy then you get a game that grows and others join for the players truthful enthusiasm and respect for management trying to give us what we vote for