Don't get in a huff and be condescending, it's not an effective form of argument and makes you look petulant. You are claiming that their content is not held in an immutable blockchain. You are wrong. You also claimed that you want nothing to do with these sewer rats, and you now have front ends that morally/ethically/legally align with your viewpoint, and will protect you from seeing said content. It seems to me that both parties here got exactly what they needed.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Its not about you or me or them, or the content...
Steemit took the unprecedented step to block their account. Right? What does this mean.
Could be anyone's account in the future.
You do realize this isn't the first account blocked from being viewed on Steemit.com, right? And you also realize that if Steemit.com begins choosing not to serve content/accounts based on their own chosen metrics, there are many options available to either see, or post, because the Steem blockchain is immutable?
I know you feel like you're making a brilliant point here, but you pinged me here questioning the immutability factor, and haven't really said anything related to that since. They are bad actors, and some front ends will choose not to show their content or interact with their accounts. I'm sorry to inform you that that does not change the way the blockchain works.
I am making a brilliant point here, ... :) Maybe you should ask @ausbitbank how to block an account?