Vaccines have no hard science to back them up. More than 90 percent of our biology is bacterial, fungal and viral DNA. The numerous viruses that are in our bodies fly in the face of how the immune system with its lock and key anti-bodies and "information on viruses" is postulated to work.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4160575/
What I mentioned about polio being isolated 20 years before we could even begin to DREAM of doing so flies in the face of any rational person. Only delusion explains your brushing it off as if I'm speaking in tongues.
A serious consequence of these facts is that an antibody against a defined antigen, e.g., a whole purified protein or a peptide, could bind to structurally related antigens that have a completely or partially different amino sequence (molecular mimicry). This means that, predicting an antibody has high affinity for the immunizing antigen is extremely difficult if not impossible.
As for the article your arrogance won't let you read, let alone consider I could quote entire sections that bring the cynicism you have to its knees, but it's there for your digestion whenever you think less of yourself.
Posted using Partiko Android
There are plenty of studies with hard evidence to back vaccines. Just not all of them.
I have the read the article and others that are similar. It all comes down to the same thing. Intellectual sophisms that might get a naive girl wet from an arm-chair philosopher that hasn't gotten laid for a while.
I don't reply to nonsensical jargon.
If you want specific replies to that article then you have to do it using your own words. Be precise. Anyone can throw links around.
In science, and what happened with polio, was done under systematic observation even if we did not completely understand the mechanism.
The study you provided does not say that vaccines do not work. It simply says that the mechanism is more complicated than previously thought.
A vaccine in general triggers the immune system to create antibodies. In other words, the composition doesn't have to be that specific but rather encompass a range in which the body can react to it.
Also stop bringing anti-vax debates to different forums to make a point. You clearly don't understand biology either and you try to play smart ass because you saw some other idiot pointing this out as evidence.
Steemit has enough anti-vaxxer morons. We don't need more.
Dude, just study biology, join a lab, and perform experiments yourself. Then start teaching the biomedical community about how antibodies don't work.
The problem is that you don't understand what you read.