Hello @kingabesh
Certainly my first time of reading about the origin of life based on the views of biochemistry. And I must confess this piece is interesting in so many ways.
The earth has been shown to be not less than 4.5 billion years old and this was known and proven 65 years ago. Life however was shown to originate a billion years later.
Learnt this now.
We are just asked to believe by religion there’s a guy out there who utters magic words, orchestrate supernatural events and boom, we have the earth.
Hahaha 😂 what can one do? Man is so gullible mehn.
In all, and on the bases of several hypotheses and counter experiments highlighted here, I give it to biochemistry views as the most logical. The use of various biochemical molecules (such as proteins, RNA, and DNA) in communicating possible micro reactions that would eventually give rise to unicellular life, makes the biochemistry concept inevitably undebatable.
Certainly a great piece.
Regards.
@eurogee of @euronation and @steemstem communities
It’s nice to have you drop by. The biochemical perspective on the origin of life is quite interesting but not a certainty. Looking at the origin of life from all angles available makes our argument much more valid and plausible. No one really knows for sure how life originated anyway.
Exactly. Thanks